I’ve been reading Leibniz again. He explains why there is suffering in this world. When God surveyed all the the possible ways the world could be, he found that this is the best, even though it contains suffering. So God created the best of all possible worlds.
But this leaves me puzzled. If there is so much suffering, why didn’t He refrain from creating any world?
The only reason I can find in Leibniz is that he says it’s better to exist than not to exist. So this world is better because it exists? However, I can find no reason why Leibniz thinks it’s better to exist than not to exist. I’d like to know so I can advise a suicidal friend.
Any help here? Please put comments on the Advanced Reasoning Forum Facebook page.
The sterility of Leibniz’s view contrasts with the creation story in The BARK of DOG. The reason that DOG created the world was so that sentient creatures could learn to love (agape), and there is no great love without suffering.
In peace and hope, Arf